ER26-3515-002 · 2026-11-09 · PJM

Thirty-Day Compliance Filing on PJM’s Large Load Definition and Large Load Registry

Read topic-matched comments in ER26-3515

Topics in the text: Registry access · Connecting load and generation · Reliability and curtailment

What the document says

Registry scope · PDF pp. 1–2

Transmittal: what survived the October order

PJM asks for an October 12 effective date for the definition and registry. It strips out the two fields that would have recorded a customer's new capacity and allocated backstop megawatts. The filing does not revive the rejected curtailment service.

the amount of BYONC brought by a particular Large Load and the allocated RBP UCAP MW quantity PDF p. 2

A registry cannot tell an operator what just tripped

Independent Market Monitor for PJM · Related public statement

The market monitor distinguished enrollment data from real-time telemetry. It said PJM had not shown how it would measure an actual reduction in the proposed interim service.

PDF p. 18, ¶40

States supported the registry while challenging a different payment rule

Organization of PJM States · Related public statement

OPSI supported the registry because states need verified data to allocate retail costs and decide how to curtail load. Its separate objection concerned automatically compensating curtailed projects. Three commissions abstained on the combined comments; that is not a vote against the registry.

PDF pp. 1, 7–10, footnote 2 and sections I.D–III

A separate registry was one remedy Google had sought

Google · Related public statement

In the original proceeding Google argued that FERC could accept the registry without accepting the remaining interim-service terms. This predates PJM’s compliance filing implementing that separation.

PDF p. 16, ¶36, citing Google protest pp. 3, 18
Filed comments: Registry access

Filing record · PDF pp. 2–5

I–III. What PJM submitted and served

PJM submits the same tariff and reliability agreement changes in marked and clean copies. The service section says PJM notified its members and state utility commissions. The conclusion asks for acceptance; it does not establish that FERC accepted this filing.

PJM respectfully requests that the Commission accept this compliance filing PDF p. 4

Registry scope · PDF pp. 6–65

Attachment A: how to read the marked text

The redlines show where PJM placed the surviving definition and reporting rules. Use the clean copy starting on PDF page 66 to read the resulting language; the reproduced definitions surrounding the edits are not all new rules.

all affiliated load facilities within a one-mile radius will be considered a single electrical site PDF p. 49

Registry scope · PDF pp. 66–86

Attachment B: tariff definition

The clean Open Access Transmission Tariff points to the Reliability Assurance Agreement for the definition. Page 109 gives the threshold and the test for grouping affiliated facilities.

“Large Load” shall have the meaning provided in the Reliability Assurance Agreement. PDF p. 68

Registry reporting · PDF pp. 87–90

Attachment DD-4: who keeps the registry

PJM maintains the registry under Schedule 11. Electric distributors coordinate with PJM and supply information they consider appropriate, including applicable retail tariffs and contracts. Section I is reserved.

any information or data the Electric Distributor believes appropriate to facilitate an accurate Large Load Registry PDF p. 89

States need usable records to set retail rules

Organization of PJM States · Related public statement

OPSI wanted meaningful state access to the registry to set retail curtailment rules and allocate costs. Its September comments distinguish the registry, which it supported, from the compensation mechanism it challenged.

PDF p. 7, section I.D
Filed comments: Registry access

Registry scope · PDF pp. 91–122

RAA Article 1: what counts as one site

The threshold is 50 MW of cumulative peak demand at one electrical site, even behind several interconnection points. Affiliated load facilities within a one-mile radius count as one site under the stated configurations.

a cumulative peak load of 50 megawatts or greater at a single electrical site behind one or more points of interconnection PDF p. 109

Registry reporting · PDF pp. 123–124

Schedule 11.B.1(a): what must be reported

Entities bound by the Operating Agreement must submit, or arrange submission of, data about each large load they serve. Fields include location, dates for each load increment, peak MW and ramp schedule, telemetry, and backup generation with fuel and permit limits.

Backup generation (MW), including fuel type and relevant permitting limitations PDF p. 124

Pennsylvania asks to see curtailment data

Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission · Related public statement

Pennsylvania’s commission supported creating a registry but wanted state commissions to have access and wanted PJM to record curtailments. Its comments addressed the proposal before FERC rejected interim curtailment service.

PDF p. 8, section II, Large Load Registry

Who answers for a supplier’s data?

Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative · Related public statement

The cooperative asked who bears liability when a distributor reports information obtained from another party, how it could recover its compliance costs, and whether the reporting manual would be filed for review.

PDF pp. 16–17, ¶37

Registry access · PDF p. 124

Schedule 11.B.1(b)–(d): validation and access

PJM may check the data with the distributor, transmission owner or customer. The text names regulators, system participants and the market monitor as possible recipients under safeguards. It does not explicitly list state consumer advocate offices.

Information maintained in the Large Load registry may be available to Authorized Commissions PDF p. 124

Ohio wants a seat for consumer advocates

Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel · Related public statement

Ohio’s consumer advocate asked FERC to give state consumer offices the same confidential access available to commissions. Customers need an advocate who can test costs and curtailment decisions, it argued. Its November 9 request challenges the October order. It does not ask PJM to publish customer records.

PDF pp. 14, 18–19

Give customers a chance to correct errors

Equinix and PJM industrial customers · Related public statement

Equinix wanted customers notified and allowed to verify or correct the information PJM would use. Industrial customers also requested an appeal and safeguards for commercial data.

PDF p. 17, ¶38
Filed comments: Registry access

Registry access · PDF p. 124

Schedule 11.B.1(e): what the public can see

PJM would post aggregate data by distributor zone or area where possible. Confidentiality protections still apply; this is not a public list of individual sites and contracts.

aggregated by Electric Distributor zone/area, where possible PDF p. 124

Aggregate figures or individual projects?

Rep. Frank Pallone Jr. (New Jersey) · Related public statement

Pallone wanted as much of the registry made public as possible to improve demand forecasts. FERC records his request separately from the states’ requests for protected access. He spoke as a member of Congress.

PDF p. 18, ¶39

Registry reporting · PDF pp. 124–125

Schedule 11.B.2: deadlines and changes of supplier

For loads in service before June 1, 2027, the serving or contracted entity must report by March 1, 2027. For loads entering service on or after June 1, it must report before startup. It must promptly report later changes, including transfer of the right to serve the load.

before the in-service date of the Large Load PDF p. 125

Responses and related views

Which customers should lose power first?

Commissioner David Rosner · Related public statement

Rosner wanted voluntary demand response called first, followed by noncritical large loads before homes and other ordinary customers. He objected to keeping demand out of the capacity market forecast. His October concurrence predates the November compliance filing.

PDF pp. 55–57, Rosner concurrence

Source sections

Printed headings where available; page ranges otherwise. Open a heading to read the original passage.