ER26-3380-000 · 2026-07-31 · PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.

Attachment C - Croop Affidavit.pdf

Read the parent filing

Read topic-matched comments in ER26-3380

Topics in the text: Cost allocation · Reliability and curtailment · Connecting load and generation

Responses and related views

No section-specific public response is linked for this document.

Source sections

Printed headings where available; page ranges otherwise. Excerpts below are selected from the text by keyword. This transcription includes OCR of scanned material; consult the original for exact wording.

Attachment C

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

Danielle Croop, Senior Manager in the Market Design group of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

I. KEY DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS AND RATIONALE

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

The RBP is a stop-gap, one- time measure aimed specifically at addressing the resource adequacy shortfall in the PJM Region, an effort design to work in part with the load that has voluntarily brought supply to the PJM Region—independently or with support of ongoing PJM bilateral matching…
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

II. REGION-WIDE PROCUREMENT OF RBP RESOURCES

printed heading · Topic match: Reliability and curtailment

The RBP is being driven by the resource adequacy shortfall at the RTO level.
Read this passage Filed comments: Reliability and curtailment

III. INTENTIONALLY

printed heading

INTENTIONALLY DIFFERENT REQUIREMENTS FOR SUPPLY ELIGIBLE TO REDUCE THE INITIAL RBP TARGET AND SUPPLY ELIGIBLE TO SUBMIT RBP SELL OFFERS AS RBP RESOURCES 10.
Read this passage

A. Supply Eligible to Reduce Initial RBP Target

printed heading · Topic match: Reliability and curtailment

PJM is defining this criterion broadly to capture all meaningful sources of new UCAP serving new load that contribute to resource adequacy and prevent double procuring for new load that is bringing new capacity to the system.
Read this passage Filed comments: Reliability and curtailment

B. Supply Eligible to Participate as RBP Resources in the RBP

printed heading · Topic match: Connecting load and generation

The exclusion of Surplus Interconnection Service (“SIS”) resources from supply eligible to serve as RBP Resources was driven by the fact that these projects do not bring any additional MFO or CIRs to the system.
Read this passage Filed comments: Connecting load and generation

IV. PAY-AS-BID STRUCTURE

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

First, the RBP is intended as a one-time procurement mechanism designed to address near-term resource adequacy challenges while PJM continues to focus on long-term market fundamentals and supporting continued commercial bilateral contracting.
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

V. VOLUME-WEIGHTED

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

This results in the cost to load being allocated for RBP Charges to not exceed $555/MW-day, on average, over the 15- year term.
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

VI. SELECTION PROCESS

printed heading

PJM is proposing to calculate a levelized procurement cost for each RBP Sell Offer to determine the selection.
Read this passage

VII. MARKET MITIGATION

printed heading

In summary, given the one-time nature of the procurement, the pay-as-bid design, the voluntary participation, and the limited scope/bilateral parallel, the implementation complexity and effectiveness would likely outweigh any corresponding benefits and therefore PJM proposes to proceed without…
Read this passage

VIII. CONTRACT FOR DIFFERENCE

printed heading · Topic match: Reliability and curtailment

If the strike price is higher than the market price, the buyer must pay the difference between the strike price and market 4 Charles River Associates, PJM Reliability Backstop RFI Summary, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (May 27, 2026),…
Read this passage Filed comments: Reliability and curtailment

IX. RBP COST ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

Cost allocation decisions should therefore be grounded in principles that appropriately assign costs to beneficiaries (demand) while respecting the jurisdictional boundaries between wholesale market operations and retail rate design.
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

A. Step 1: Allocating to Electric Distributor Zone/Area

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

To allocate costs, i.e., RBP Charges, PJM is proposing to determine cost responsibility by starting with the Initial RBP Target and determining how responsibility for the RBP UCAP MW in the Initial RBP Target should be allocated. 43.
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation

B. Example of Allocation to Electric Distributor Zone/Area

printed heading

Example of Allocation to Electric Distributor Zone/Area 46.
Read this passage

C. Step 2: Allocating to LSEs and/or End-Use Customers Based on

printed heading

Step 2: Allocating to LSEs and/or End-Use Customers Based on RERRA-Determined Allocation or Allocating to LSEs Based on PJM Backup Allocation 51.
Read this passage

D. Example of Allocation to Electric Distributor Zone/Area

printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation

In the first scenario, the designated RBO MW that should be used to allocate charges to each LSE is submitted to PJM by the Electric Distributor and then PJM will apply the cost allocation and settle RBP Charges accordingly.
Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation