Read topic-matched comments in EL26-70
Topics in the text: Reliability and curtailment · Connecting load and generation · Retail and wholesale authority
State authority · PDF pp. 2–7
MISO combines forecasts from load-serving entities with an annual survey of resource owners; state and retail regulators retain responsibility for determining required adequacy.
LSEs are the entities responsible for providing demand forecasts PDF p. 4
Organization of MISO States · Direct response
OMS said the report does not fully reflect state proceedings on resource planning, retail rates and utility approvals because MISO is not a party to those proceedings. It wanted regional planning to complement, rather than displace, state responsibility for adequacy.
PDF pp. 1–3Interconnection · PDF pp. 7–9
MISO reports that a delayed neighboring-system study need not stop a generator’s application from advancing.
allowing Interconnection Customers to move forward even where an affected system study is delayed PDF p. 9
Co-location · PDF pp. 9–14
The proposed zero-injection agreement would give paired generation and load a study path without granting delivery rights on the wider system. MISO later filed the agreement in ER26-3552.
will be co-located with load and will not inject energy further onto the Transmission System PDF p. 10
Printed headings where available; page ranges otherwise. Open a heading to read the original passage.