Skip to main content

Brownfield Opportunities

Loading…

    — sites · — datacenter-ready
    Sites tracked — across 4 programs
    Acres tracked — with reported area
    Datacenter-ready — ≥50 ac · power · water
    Hyperscale-ready — ≥100 ac · ≥230 kV · ≤1 mi
    Generation-ready — ≥75 score · land · grid export

    Filters

    Program
    NPL Status
    Data-center tier
    Site Program State Acreage Status City County DC score
    Lens
    Narrow with the global filters (⚙) — search, state, program, tier, and acreage all apply here too.

    Loading…

    How this ranking works

    Every site gets a 0–100 suitability score from the data already on its record — no opinions, just public federal signals. Pick a lens above: Data Center (siting a compute load), Generation (siting new power), or Manufacturing (siting a plant — rail-weighted, mid-size-acreage sweet spot). The table is sorted best-first for the chosen lens.

    The score is a weighted sum of power access (transmission distance & voltage, substation, grid inheritance), land (acreage), gas, logistics (highway/rail), and readiness (cleanup status, reuse, EPA flag, incentives) — minus penalties for flood zones, climate risk, and (Data Center lens only) a restrictive state regulatory climate. Sites with no transmission data show “—”.

    Tier is a quick capacity bucket: Edge → Colo → Hyperscale → Mega, driven by acreage and grid headroom.

    Signals badges explain the score at a glance — green/blue = upside (Land Ready, OZ, IRA, EPA DC, Grid Inherit, Nuclear, Fed Fast Lane, Water), red = risk/drag (Flood, Climate, Zoning). Open any row for the full per-component breakdown.

    # Site ST Acres Score Tier kV Sub mi Plant Gas mi Signals

    Retired industrial sites — by prior use

    Large facilities that ceased EPA GHGRP reporting — which can mean closed, idled, or simply dropping below the reporting threshold. Treat it as a screening signal: a former smelter, mill, refinery, or mine may retain reusable grid infrastructure worth investigating for data-center or generation reuse. It does not by itself confirm the site is available or still connected. Counts by the facility's prior use.

    Loading retired-site data…

    Nuclear reactor siting — 14 military installations

    A screening of named DoD installations for hosting a nuclear plant, by reactor class: large Gen III+ PWRs (AP1000 1,117 MWe / APR1400 1,400 MWe — wet-cooled, certified designs) are a separate category from SMRs (AP300-class) and microreactors (Janus-class), whose 3–300× smaller water demand and dry-cooling options change which sites are viable at all. Acreage is treated as a per-class eligibility threshold, while each base scores 0–100 across cooling water (availability × rights obtainability), electrical infrastructure (transmission + substation), construction workforce, and fiber. Click any row for the full breakdown, sources, and unscored geohazard flags. ★ Janus marks the 9 sites on the U.S. Army's Nov 2025 microreactor shortlist; the other 5 (all Air Force-led) come from the Air Force's AI-data-center Request for Lease (AFCEC-26-R-0002), marked AF RFLP.

    How this ranking works & data provenance

    Priority order. Acreage is a threshold screen for now: the table keeps the developable-acreage estimate and citation, but sites that clear 500 developable acres are not ranked higher just for having more land. The weighted score then prioritizes water (40), electrical infrastructure (38 total: transmission 22 + substation 16), construction workforce within ~1 hour (15), and fiber (7). Weights sum to 100.

    Data provenance. Transmission and substation distance/voltage are computed from the project's own infra-proximity spatial index (the same machinery behind every other site). Developable acreage, cooling-water adequacy, construction-workforce availability, and fiber are analyst-researched from public sources (cited in each row's detail) — this project has no federal water, workforce, or fiber GIS layer, so those are explicitly an analyst assessment, not a measured layer.

    Water demand & rights citations. Per-unit water demand anchors on the as-built Vogtle 3&4 environmental record (DOE EIS-0476 / NUREG-1872): 26.8 MGD withdrawal / 20.1 MGD (31.1 cfs) consumptive per AP1000; NRC accepted Vogtle at ~1% of average Savannah River discharge, which anchors the low-flow margin tiers. Per-site flow figures are validated against USGS streamgages in ap1000-water-validation.md. The water-rights obtainability class (obtainable ×1.0 / contested ×0.6 / fully-appropriated ×0.2, multiplied into the water score) is curated per site with its legal gatekeeper cited in the row detail — state doctrine background: FJC surface-water rights overview.

    Not in the score: acreage beyond threshold, seismic & flood. Acreage is shown with source context but is not a differentiating score once the site clears the land threshold. Geohazards aren't folded into the number either — but they're genuinely deal-affecting for a reactor (Edwards, Fort Campbell, JBLM and Fort Wainwright all carry real flags), so each row surfaces them as amber/red context chips. The Army's Janus interest is a microreactor (≤20 MWe) signal — a permitting/intent precedent, not a like-for-like for a gigawatt-class AP1000.

    Loading AP1000 siting data…

    US Brownfield & Federal Site Atlas

    This dashboard indexes 46,700+ contaminated federal and brownfield sites across four programs and scores each one for data-center and power-generation suitability using public infrastructure, financial, and risk signals.

    The four programs

    Superfund (EPA NPL)
    The National Priorities List — the most contaminated sites in the US under EPA's CERCLA authority. ~1,908 sites. Strongest remediation data: documents, ECHO enforcement, AI summaries, milestone dates.
    Brownfields (EPA ACRES)
    ~36,000 brownfield properties tracked by EPA's Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System. Former gas stations, factories, and rail yards. Acreage data is not available from EPA's source.
    FUDS (US Army Corps)
    ~8,800 Formerly Used Defense Sites — military land conveyed out of federal ownership before 1986, where DoD still has cleanup obligations. USACE tracks eligibility and active projects. ~66% lack digitized polygon boundaries.
    BRAC (DoD Base Closures)
    27 installations closed under Base Realignment and Closure rounds. Large-acreage sites (often 500–4,000+ acres) with existing utilities, roads, and sometimes grid connections.

    Map overlays

    ★Confirmed deals
    10 confirmed hyperscale/colo data-center projects already built on brownfield or former-industrial land (Google/Widows Creek, AWS/Susquehanna, Aligned/Conesville, etc.) — reference points for what a successful conversion looks like.
    ◆Retired industrial
    ~660 large retired industrial sites nationwide that ceased EPA GHGRP reporting — ~530 manufacturing (chemical plants, smelters, steel/paper mills, cement, glass, refineries, auto-assembly) plus ~125 mining (mostly coal mines / prep plants). A screening signal — a former smelter, mill, or refinery may retain reusable grid infrastructure (not confirmed available or still connected; the overlay isn't yet joined to transmission/closure evidence). These often sit outside the four programs above.

    Siting scores explained

    DC composite score (0–100)
    Weighted rubric for siting a data-center load. Positive weights sum to 100: transmission distance (16 pts), voltage class (14), substation proximity (12), grid inheritance from a large co-located / retired / nuclear plant (8), acreage (20), gas pipeline (10), logistics — highway + rail (6), readiness signals (14). Then subtractive penalties: −18 for a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area, up to −10 for Very-High FEMA wildfire/drought risk, and up to −8 for a restrictive state regulatory climate (DC-lens only). The result is clamped to 0–100. Returns N/A when no transmission data is available (can't assess power access ≠ a bad site).
    Generation score (0–100)
    Weighted rubric for siting new power generation — weighted differently because what suits a 200 MW compute load ≠ a 200 MW solar/gas build. Positive weights sum to 100: acreage (24 pts, the dominant constraint), transmission-to-export (18), substation interconnection (14), voltage headroom (12), gas pipeline (10), grid reuse — repowering a retired plant's interconnection (8), ISO/RTO market access (8), readiness (6). It has no active-plant component (you are the plant) and gives no credit for active reuse (occupied land is a liability for a ground-up build). Carries the same flood (−18) and climate (−10) penalties and the same transmission gate as the DC lens, but not the regulatory penalty (a DC moratorium doesn't block a power plant).
    DC tier (Edge / Colo / Hyperscale / Mega)
    Quick-filter bucket derived from acreage + transmission distance + voltage class. Used by the persona buttons and ?dc_tier= URL parameter. Separate from the 0–100 composite score.
    Datacenter-ready
    EPA's official RE-Powering designation: Superfund sites with ≥50 acres, electric transmission, and water service area. ~821 sites. EPA's own flag, not a computed score.
    Hyperscale-ready
    Sites meeting the hyperscale tier threshold: ≥100 acres, ≥230 kV transmission within 1 mile. ~250 sites across all four programs.
    Generation-ready
    Sites scoring ≥75 on the Generation lens — strong land, grid export, and market combination. ~114 sites.

    Infrastructure signals

    Transmission line
    Miles to the nearest HIFLD high-voltage line, plus its voltage (kV). Source: HIFLD Electric Power Transmission Lines (~52k polylines).
    Substation
    Miles to the nearest HV substation (≥69 kV). Source: OpenStreetMap power=substation via Overpass API. HIFLD substations went private in 2025.
    Power plant
    Miles to the nearest plant, its capacity (MW), and primary fuel. Co-located coal/gas plants ≥500 MW within 1 mile earn the Grid Inherit signal — they may carry stranded FERC interconnection agreements worth hundreds of millions in avoided queue costs. Source: HIFLD (~13,400 EIA-860 plants).
    Gas pipeline
    Miles to the nearest interstate or intrastate natural gas pipeline. Relevant for behind-the-meter generation. Source: HIFLD (~33k polylines).
    Highway / Rail
    Miles to the nearest primary road (Census TIGER S1100) and railroad (Census TIGER). Logistics signals for construction and supply chains.
    Flood zone
    FEMA NFHL zone code. Sites in Special Flood Hazard Areas (Zone A/AE/V/VE) receive a −18 point penalty in both scores. Sites with no FEMA data are not penalized.
    Natural-hazard risk
    FEMA National Risk Index county composite plus three DC-relevant hazard ratings — wildfire (insurability / continuity), drought (cooling-water), and heat wave (cooling load). The worst of wildfire/drought drives a climate penalty (−10 Very High, −5 Relatively High) in both scores; heat wave is shown but not penalized. Source: FEMA NRI county FeatureServer.
    Retired power plant
    Miles to the nearest large (≥100 MW) retired dispatchable plant from EIA-860M. A retired plant ≤1 mile is the strongest grid-inheritance signal — stranded interconnection with no active load competing for it (the Conesville / Widows Creek pattern). Drives the Ret. Plant badge and full grid-inheritance scoring credit. Source: EIA Form EIA-860M.
    IRA energy community
    Whether the site is in an Inflation Reduction Act energy community (coal-closure tract or fossil-fuel-employment county) — a +10pp ITC/PTC bonus on a clean-energy build. Source: DOE NETL 2024 layers.
    Opportunity Zone
    Treasury-designated QOZ tract status and whether it is Rural (~700 of 8,765 tracts). Rural OZ sites also qualify for IRA clean energy community credits. Source: HUD FeatureServer.
    ISO / RTO
    Regional transmission organization: PJM, MISO, ERCOT, CAISO, SPP, NYISO, ISO-NE, or non-RTO. Affects interconnection queue access and electricity market structure. Source: EIA Atlas.
    Climate zone
    IECC/ASHRAE zone (e.g. 5B, 3A) from DOE Building America county data. Cooler zones mean lower cooling-energy overhead (lower PUE).

    Readiness signals

    Cleanup Complete
    Superfund sites formally deleted from the NPL — EPA certifies cleanup meets health and environmental standards. ~300 of 1,908 NPL sites.
    Active Reuse
    Sites in active reuse per EPA's RedevelopmentAppSitePoints. Superfund-only.
    EPA Candidate
    EPA's official data-center reuse designation: ≥50 acres, electric transmission, water service area. ~821 sites.
    Fed Fast Lane (EO 14318)
    Executive Order 14318 (July 2025) created NEPA categorical exclusions and fast-tracked Army Corps permits for qualifying data center developments on Superfund and brownfield sites.
    OZ / OZ·Rural
    Qualified Opportunity Zone status. Rural OZ sites receive the higher IRA bonus (+10pp PTC/ITC) and a 30% OZ basis step-up vs. 15% standard.
    Land Ready
    EPA Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use (SWRAU) — EPA's own determination that all of a site's land is ready for its anticipated use. The strongest public land-availability signal. ~940 Superfund sites meet the measure.
    IRA / IRA·Coal
    Inflation Reduction Act energy community (coal-closure tract = "IRA·Coal", or fossil-fuel-employment county). +10pp ITC/PTC bonus on a paired clean-energy build.
    Ret. Plant / Grid Inherit / Nuclear
    Grid-inheritance signals: a large retired plant ≤1 mi (Ret. Plant), a large active coal/gas plant ≤1 mi (Grid Inherit), or an operating nuclear plant ≥500 MW ≤5 mi (Nuclear — the AWS/Susquehanna PPA pattern). Each implies an inheritable / nearby high-voltage interconnection.
    Water
    An active CWA/NPDES discharge permit on the site (EPA ECHO) — a proxy for legacy industrial water infrastructure (intake, treated-effluent rights). Water is the #2 DC siting constraint after grid.
    Climate / Zoning (risk)
    Red risk badges that lower the score: Climate flags Very-High FEMA wildfire/drought (−10); Zoning flags a restrictive state regulatory climate — moratorium bills, by-right repeals, ratepayer cost-shift laws (−8, DC-lens only).

    How to use this tool

    Map view
    Click any marker to open the site detail panel. Markers are sized by acreage. Zoom in to see all sites in a dense region — markers are decimated at low zoom for performance.
    Filters
    The gear (⚙) button opens filters: program, NPL status, state, acreage, DC tier persona, Opportunity Zone, and DC candidate toggle. All filters round-trip via the URL — share a filtered view with the ⎘ button.
    Rankings tab
    Ranked table of all scored sites. Switch between the Data Center, Generation, and Manufacturing lenses; the global filters apply here too.
    KPI cells
    The Datacenter-ready and Hyperscale-ready cells are clickable — they toggle a filter to show only those sites.
    Export
    The ↓ button exports the current filtered set as a CSV, including all infrastructure distances, scores, and enrichment fields.
    Site detail panel
    Opens on any marker or table-row click. Shows siting score breakdowns, infrastructure distances, federal documents, ECHO enforcement, and state tax incentive context. The Summary tab shows the AI-generated narrative.

    Data sources & freshness

    • EPA Superfund NPL — EPA FeatureServer
    • EPA ACRES Brownfields — EPA FeatureServer (2021 snapshot)
    • USACE FUDS — ArcGIS FeatureServer
    • DoD BRAC — ESRI milbases FeatureServer
    • EPA RE-Powering — RedevelopmentAppSitePoints FeatureServer
    • HIFLD — Transmission lines, power plants, gas pipelines
    • OpenStreetMap — Substations via Overpass API
    • Census TIGER — Roads, railroads, county boundaries
    • FEMA NFHL — Flood Hazard Zones (per-site query)
    • HUD Opportunity Zones — QOZ tracts
    • EIA Atlas — ISO/RTO region polygons
    • DOE Building America — ASHRAE climate zones
    • EPA ECHO — Enforcement history + NPDES water permits (Superfund only)
    • FEMA National Risk Index — County natural-hazard ratings (wildfire, drought, heat)
    • DOE NETL — IRA energy communities (coal-closure tracts, fossil-fuel-employment counties)
    • EIA-860M — Retired power-plant generators
    • EPA GHGRP — Retired heavy-industrial facilities (Envirofacts REST)

    Dashboard v1.24 · Last data refresh: —. Source code and raw data files: GitHub. The AI Summary on each site detail panel is generated from these federal records — see any site's Summary tab.

    —

    No AI summary on file for this site yet — coverage grows as the ai-summary connector backfills more sites.

    Program
    —
    Acreage
    —
    Status
    —
    EPA ID
    —
    Federal Facility
    —
    EPA Region
    —
    Address
    —
    Coordinates
    —
    Last Updated
    —

    Siting suitability

    Computed from grid, gas, land, market, flood, FEMA climate-risk, and state regulatory signals already on this record. Higher = stronger candidate.

    Sub-sites

    This site has 0 NPL sub-sites rolled up:

      Owner & encumbrances

      Current owner
      Not available
      Owner source
      —
      Historical owners
      Not available
      Encumbrances
      Not available

      Federal documents

        All site documents on EPA →

        FUDS details

        Eligibility
        —
        Property status
        —
        Has projects
        —

        Infrastructure proximity

        Transmission line
        Not available
        Substation
        Not available
        Power plant
        Not available
        Retired plant
        Not available
        Rail line
        Not available
        Highway
        Not available
        Gas pipeline
        Not available
        Flood zone
        Not available
        ISO/RTO
        Not available
        Climate zone
        Not available
        Natural-hazard risk
        Not available
        Opportunity Zone
        Not available
        IRA energy community
        Not available
        Water service area
        Not available
        Wastewater
        Not available
        Population density
        Not available
        Data center candidate
        Not available
        Land readiness
        Not available

        Enforcement & compliance EPA ECHO

        Current compliance
        Not available
        Inspections (5yr)
        Not available
        Formal actions (5yr)
        Not available
        Informal actions (5yr)
        Not available
        Penalties (5yr)
        Not available
        Last violation
        Not available
        Last inspection
        Not available
        Last formal action
        Not available
        Active programs
        Not available
        Water permit (NPDES)
        Not available

        Full Detailed Facility Report on EPA ECHO →

        Federal funding

        Cleanup status
        Not available
        Completion date
        Not available
        Total EPA grants
        Not available
        Grant types
        Not available

        Source: EPA ACRES brownfield grants program

        Nearby sites

          Source profile

          Sources EPA Superfund, EPA ACRES, USACE FUDS, DOD BRAC, EPA RE-Powering.
          Refreshed — · Open data on GitHub