Comments of the Illinois Commerce Commission in support of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.’s 07/31/2026 filing
Read topic-matched comments in ER26-3380
Topics in the text: Cost allocation · Registry access · Reliability and curtailment
Responses and related views
No section-specific public response is linked for this document.
Source sections
Printed headings where available; page ranges otherwise. Excerpts below are selected from the text by keyword.
Opening text
opening text · Topic match: Reliability and curtailment
The ICC recommends that the Commission require sufficient mitigation efforts to protect against cost shifts to or any negative impacts on existing ratepayers, impose no new obligations upon the states, and require PJM to provide the clarifications, transparency, and access to data as discussed…Read this passage Filed comments: Reliability and curtailment
I. COMMENTS
printed heading
I.Read this passage
A. The Core Elements of PJM’s Reliability Backstop Procurement Proposal are
printed heading · Topic match: Cost allocation
PJM proposes to “empower” states by imposing on them an obligation to “submit RBP RBOs, which PJM would then apply to the allocation of RBP Charges” to load serving entities (“LSEs”).5 Given the timing and the lack of implementation details, particularly for retail access states like Illinois,…Read this passage Filed comments: Cost allocation
B. PJM’s Proposal Requires Active Collaboration Between PJM and States
printed heading · Topic match: Registry access
PJM’s territory covers vastly different market structures and PJM’s proposals must work for all of them.Read this passage Filed comments: Registry access
II. CONCLUSION
printed heading
The ICC further requests any and all other appropriate relief.Read this passage
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
printed heading
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of August, 2026. /s/ Christine F.Read this passage